Recent scrutiny of federal programs in Minnesota has drawn national attention to serious oversight failures at the state level. Those problems are not isolated. Audits in Georgia and other states reveal similar warning signs that raise broader concerns about accountability, internal controls, and the use of federal funds.
Georgia stands out nationally. The state is unique among states in having received a disclaimer of opinion on portions of its annual financial report (ACFR) every year since 2020, related to its business-type activities and the Unemployment Compensation Fund. A disclaimer means auditors were unable to obtain enough evidence to determine whether the financial information was reliable. In the private sector, this type of audit result would raise serious concerns for investors and lenders and would likely draw scrutiny from regulators such as the SEC and the IRS.
In addition to the financial report audit, because Georgia spends large amounts of federal money, it undergoes a Single Audit. A Single Audit is a comprehensive review of how a state manages federal funds, examining whether money is spent in compliance with federal rules and whether internal controls are strong enough to prevent errors, waste, or fraud.
The 2024 Single Audit of Georgia highlighted serious problems in multiple programs:
“Weak oversight and inadequate controls create a serious risk that federal and state funds are misused, go unaccounted for, or are not recovered when improper payments occur,” said Sheila Weinberg, founder and CEO of Truth in Accounting. “Georgia’s audit results highlight the urgent need to strengthen internal controls, improve transparency, and make sure taxpayer dollars are spent as intended.”
At Truth in Accounting, our mission is to provide citizens with clear, accurate, and transparent information about government finances. We believe that truthful accounting, free from gimmicks, omissions, and overly optimistic assumptions, is essential for holding elected officials accountable and for ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. That's why we closely examine reports like Georgia's Fiscal Year 2024 Single Audit, released in April 2025 by State Auditor Greg S. Griffin. Our analysis of their annual comprehensive financial report showed their Financial State of the States 2025 report shows Georgia maintaining a healthy Taxpayer Surplus™ of $4,000 per taxpayer, earning a "B" grade and ranking 19th out of 50 states. The Single Audit report uncovers troubling weaknesses in internal controls and compliance that could jeopardize this progress. These issues underscore the ongoing need for full accrual accounting and enhanced oversight to safeguard Georgians from hidden risks and mismanagement.
The single audit, conducted under Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance, evaluates Georgia's handling of over $47 billion in federal expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2024. On the surface, the state's basic financial statements received unmodified (clean) opinions in most areas, including governmental activities, discretely presented component units, and major funds such as the General Fund and the Higher Education Fund. This aligns with the improvements we've noted in our reports, where Georgia's assets exceeded its bills by $13.6 billion in FY 2024, driven by strong revenues and prudent management of some liabilities.
However, the auditors issued a stark disclaimer of opinion on the business-type activities and the Unemployment Compensation Fund. This means they were unable to obtain sufficient evidence to form an opinion, primarily due to inadequate records or controls in these areas. The Unemployment Compensation Fund, managed by the Department of Labor, is particularly concerning. A disclaimer here signals potential underreporting of obligations. Without reliable data, taxpayers are left in the dark about the true cost of these programs, risking future burdens if claims surge.
Compounding this, the audit identified five material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting—deficiencies severe enough to create a reasonable possibility of material misstatements. These include:
Additionally, eight significant deficiencies were noted, further underscoring governance lapses. These control failures not only violate auditing standards but also erode public trust. As we've seen in states with poorer grades, such as Illinois (ranked 48th with a massive Taxpayer Burden™), unchecked weaknesses can lead to spiraling debts. Georgia's "B" grade is commendable, but these audit red flags warn that without fixes, the state's surplus could erode.
Federal Program Compliance: Adverse and Qualified Opinions Signal Mismanagement Risks
Georgia's reliance on federal aid, totaling over $47 billion in expenditures, makes compliance critical. Yet the audit paints a concerning picture here as well. The state did not qualify as a low-risk auditee, meaning heightened scrutiny in future audits. Of the major programs tested, one received an adverse opinion, and five others received qualified opinions, indicating material noncompliance that could lead to questioned costs, fund recoveries, or reduced future allocations.
The adverse opinion on the Unemployment Insurance program (ALN 17.225), administered by the Department of Labor, is especially alarming. This program, which provided benefits during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, failed to comply materially with requirements in areas such as eligibility determinations, employer-filed claims, and overpayment reporting (Findings 2024-019 through 2024-023). Auditors noted material weaknesses in controls leading to potential improper payments and fraud risks. With unemployment funds tied to taxpayer-backed liabilities, this noncompliance directly threatens Georgia's fiscal stability, much like the pension shortfalls we calculate in our Taxpayer Surplus™ metric.
Qualified opinions were issued for:
These qualified programs represent critical services for vulnerable Georgians, from child nutrition to mental health support. Noncompliance here not only risks federal clawbacks, potentially in the millions based on sampled questioned costs, but also inefficient use of taxpayer funds. Our transparency score for Georgia (55/100, ranking 45th nationally) reflects these very issues: incomplete or delayed reporting hides the full picture from citizens.
Material weaknesses in internal controls over major programs were widespread, affecting eligibility, reporting, and special tests across agencies. For instance, in student financial aid (various ALNs), universities such as Georgia Tech and others failed to properly handle returns of Title IV funds or enrollment reporting (Findings 2024-015, etc.), potentially leading to overawards.
While Georgia's overall financial health has improved, moving from a modest surplus in 2023 to $13.6 billion available in 2024, these audit findings reveal cracks in the foundation. Our Financial State of the States methodology, which accounts for all liabilities on a full accrual basis, shows progress, but persistent control weaknesses could reverse gains. Factors like potential reductions in federal aid (we estimate a $7.5 billion drop if levels revert to pre-COVID norms) amplify the risks. The audit's repeat findings, many echoing prior years, suggest a lack of sustained corrective action, a pattern we've criticized in "sinkhole" states.
Truth in Accounting urges Georgia lawmakers and Governor Brian P. Kemp to prioritize reforms:
Georgians deserve government finances that are not just balanced but are truthfully presented. By addressing these audit issues head-on, the Peach State can solidify its "B" grade and build a more accountable future.